@prefix dcterms: <http://purl.org/dc/terms/> .
@prefix owl: <http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#> .
@prefix qudt: <http://qudt.org/schema/qudt/> .
@prefix rdf: <http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#> .
@prefix rdfs: <http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#> .
@prefix xsd: <http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#> .

qudt:coherentUnitSystem a rdf:Property,
        owl:AnnotationProperty ;
    rdfs:label "coherent unit system" ;
    dcterms:description """
  <p>A system of units is coherent with respect to a system of quantities and equations if the system of units is chosen in such a way that the equations between numerical values have exactly the same form (including the numerical factors) as the corresponding equations between the quantities. 
  In such a coherent system, no numerical factor other than the number 1 ever occurs in the expressions for the derived units in terms of the base units. 
  For example, the $newton$ and the $joule$. 
  These two are, respectively, the force that causes one kilogram to be accelerated at 1 metre per (1) second per (1) second, and the work done by 1 newton acting over 1 metre. 
  Being coherent refers to this consistent use of 1. 
  In the old c.g.s. system , with its base units the centimetre and the gram, the corresponding coherent units were the dyne and the erg,
   respectively the force that causes 1 gram to be accelerated at 1 centimetre per (1) second per (1) second, and the work done by 1 dyne acting over 1 centimetre. 
  So $1\\,newton = 10^5 dyne$, $1 joule = 10^7 erg$, making each of the four compatible in a decimal sense within its respective other system, but not coherent therein.</p>
  """^^qudt:LatexString ;
    qudt:informativeReference "https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Coherence_(units_of_measurement)"^^xsd:anyURI ;
    rdfs:isDefinedBy <http://qudt.org/3.2.1/schema/qudt>,
        <http://qudt.org/3.2.1/schema/shacl/qudt> ;
    rdfs:subPropertyOf qudt:hasUnitSystem .

